Inputs3

Product

Aesop 'Marrakech Intense' 50ml amber glass bottle, matte black cap

Qa Rubric

CAMPAIGN QA RUBRIC — score each criterion 1-5 from the pixels only. (1) IDENTITY: label, cap, closure and proportions identical to the master in every variant. (2) SURFACE + GRADE: same surface and same warm editorial grade across all five frames. (3) LIGHT: one hard window light from the left with long raking shadows in every frame. (4) FRAMING: feed is square, banner is wide with clear empty space at right, flat-lay is top-down, story is vertical low-angle. (5) CLEANLINESS: no text, no letters, no watermark, no duplicated or extra product. VERDICT is FAIL if any criterion scores below 4.

Setting

wet volcanic stone slab surface, editorial sun-drenched North African mood

Outputs6
Approved Master
Approved Master
Hero Banner
Hero Banner
Story
Story
Instagram Feed
Instagram Feed
Flat-lay
Flat-lay

QA Verdict

CAMPAIGN QA REPORT 1. IDENTITY — SCORE 2 - Evidence: The label content is not held constant. In the master (frame 1) the wordmark is a faint partial impression. In the feed crop (frame 2) the front face carries a fully rendered lockup reading Aēsop / Marrakech Intense / 50ml AND a second Aēsop wordmark ghosted on the right shoulder of the bottle — a duplicated mark that does not exist on the master. Banner (frame 3), flat-lay (frame 4) and story (frame 5) each show yet another different partial-text state. Cap, closure and amber-glass proportions read consistent, but the label is not identical across variants. - Frame at fault: 2 (extra/duplicated wordmark and fully legible label), with drift also in 3, 4, 5. 2. SURFACE + GRADE — SCORE 4 - Evidence: Warm editorial grade and the same wet-speckled amber glass on charcoal lava stone are held across all five frames. Story (frame 5) runs marginally cooler/less saturated in the shadows but stays inside tolerance. 3. LIGHT — SCORE 4 - Evidence: One hard window source enters from the upper left in every frame, producing the long raking shadow and the warm cast pool to the right of the base. Consistent and on-brief. 4. FRAMING — SCORE 2 - Evidence: Feed (frame 2) is correctly square. Banner (frame 3) is correctly wide with clear negative space at right. Story (frame 5) is correctly vertical and low-angle. However the flat-lay (frame 4) is NOT top-down — it is shot at the same three-quarter eye-level perspective as the master, showing the front face and side of the bottle with the stone edge in profile. A flat-lay requires a true overhead camera. This is a hard miss. - Frame at fault: 4 (perspective is 3/4, not top-down). 5. CLEANLINESS — SCORE 2 - Evidence: Feed crop (frame 2) contains fully legible letters — Aēsop, Marrakech Intense, 50ml — plus a second duplicated Aēsop wordmark on the bottle shoulder. Per the rubric this counts as both prohibited legible text and a duplicated element. Other frames keep text as an illegible impression, so the violation is isolated to frame 2. - Frame at fault: 2 (readable text + duplicated wordmark). VERDICT: FAIL (criteria 1, 4 and 5 each score below 4). RE-RUN INSTRUCTIONS (one line per failing frame): - Frame 2 (feed): re-run to remove the duplicated Aēsop shoulder wordmark and reduce label to the same faint partial impression as the master — no legible text. - Frame 4 (flat-lay): re-run as a true top-down overhead capture, not the master's three-quarter angle, keeping identity, grade and left-side light intact.

AI Workflow Automation

a hands-off content pipeline that briefs, generates, self-QAs, and publishes. Useful for: marketing/creative ops teams who want one node graph to turn a product brief into an approved, on-brand campaign set without a human babysitting each step.

Louis Anderson

AI Workflow Automation